.NET Core was already a popular development platform, and the 3.1.1 Stable release version in 2020 has triggered even more interest in moving to it. However, there are still questions that may linger in the minds of the decision-makers. Some of these questions include:
This blog answers these questions so that you can make the best decision for your organization.
Before any other questions, you might be wondering “why?” Many developers who have moved to .NET Core can testify to the pleasant experience they had with this edition. This experience is enhanced by the following benefits.
Convenient Deployment: The convenience with which one is able to deploy .NET Core makes the whole experience smooth. You can publish the application complete with everything you want included. The best part is that you can run it on all three primary operating systems: Linux, Windows, and MacOS.
Fluid Performance: Deployment is just the start of the .NET Core’s overall performance. You will notice sophisticated performance in comparison to the earlier edition. This is despite the hitches experienced when dealing with sites that have heavy traffic, which results in some static files.
Easier Development Pattern Implementation: Dependency injection is something you will need for implementation of development patterns. Native support for this makes the whole process easier and even training others to use this concept is easier.
Cross-Platform: Not every organization may need this, but it is possible and for those that need it, it’s big benefit. It is indeed a worthy successor to the good old .NET framework and Microsoft has already published simple to understand and practical tutorials for new users moving to this framework.
As you use .NET Core, you may discover even more benefits. Talking with other organizations that are already using it will result in discovering even more benefits.
With anything, the platform may not be for every organization. What may be a plus today might get upgraded and seem like a minus tomorrow. Here are some downsides to switching that make some developers think twice.
These concerns are not permanent hurdles since you can find solutions to them. Microsoft too will continue to provide support for the platform, so there will be fixes for problems developers may encounter now or in the future.
You can save time by starting new projects in .NET Core since there are so many benefits to the platform.
Now, whether you should move to other existing projects, time may be the biggest deciding factor. If you can set aside the time to complete the project, then, by all means, go ahead and move especially if you are dealing with MVC projects.
If you are dealing with WebForm projects, the size of the project will play a role in determining the need to move or not. For small and simple projects, you can put in the work and move to it while huge projects might not be worth the effort at present.
If you are still using Crystal Reports, then you might find yourself disappointed once you try to move to .NET Core. Many who have tried have hit a frustrating dead end and had to search for an alternative.
It is obviously hard to imagine saying goodbye to Crystal Reports given the fact that it seems quite efficient when it comes to reports. However, you can find a worthy alternative that measures up to or even surpasses your expectations.
Because Crystal Reports has no plans to support .NET Core, it becomes even more imperative that you find a solution. The alternative will need to have features that include ease of use, report creation in the correct formats, as well as the ability to seamlessly integrate with .NET Core.
The best alternative is Windward!
Windward’s application is one of the best document generations software systems you can come across. It ticks all the boxes when it comes to the best alternative to Crystal Reports while working in .NET Core.
Let’s take a look at some of those features:
When you talk of ease of use, no doubt Crystal Reports is one of those applications that you can deal with easily. Windward too is a similar application and even better!
With Windward, you are able to use it with the usual computer applications that you are already used to like Microsoft Word. This means it will be instantly familiar to you and there is less time spent learning how to use the program.
There are also tutorials just in case you still need guidance and the customer support can also provide assistance.
Windward is intended for document generation, which means reports can also be generated in .NET Core. It is efficient when it comes to collecting data from different sources to be used in a report and the final report is easy to understand. Windward will produce the report in any format you need it, which includes PDF that Crystal Reports usually uses.
Your Crystal Reports alternative needs to be able to integrate with ease when you are using other programs. One of the strong points in favor of Windward is that it integrates seamlessly with other programs and the developers continue to make it compatible with more platforms. Very soon you will be able to easily use .NET Core with Windward.
The Windward interface is made not just appealing, but also functional. It is easy to find whatever you want on the interface which makes it faster to use for different report tasks. So far, users are happy with the interface it presents since it is adapted from familiar programs and it has been simplified even more.
So, are you still searching for an alternative?
Hopefully, you are ready to try out Windward.
To get more information about it before you make the choice. You can get a demo version that will give you even more insight into how efficiently it integrates with a wide range of applications including .NET Core.
Dealing with .NET Core may be a bit complicated, but the benefits are evident. And, you have document generation tools like Windward to help create reports in just a few clicks without the need for any coding.
It may take careful consideration to make the decision to move to this platform and this decision will need to be supported by careful planning so that it can be done effectively and then followed up with upgrades when needed to get the best out of it. Once again, it may not be for every organization, but a closer study of how it would affect individual organizations can drive the decision to move or not.